Tuesday, February 14, 2006
One million and an alliance
Today is a day of remembrance that comes after much disillusionment. As I watch hundreds of thousands waving Lebanese flags, albeit with less purpose than a year ago, I can’t help but wonder: now what?
When Saad Hariri, Walid Jumblatt and Samir Geagea held hands and addressed the crowds directly, it became clear they were seeking a mandate for a stronger and more potent alliance. A response of sorts to Hizbullah and Aoun that drew sharp political boundaries. In his speech, Jumblatt accused Bashar of being a terrorist, and demanded the Lebanese army be sent to the border region and the southern suburb. Saad said there will be no compromises.
The hope is that this renewed alliance, which should no longer go by "March 14", will stand up for Lebanon through action and not just words.
Update 2: An-Nahar has an excellent set of pictures here. (pdf)
television suisse romande
le nouvel obs
le figaro (france)
les autres ne parlent que de centaines de personnes entre autre:
only the pro government media are talking about 1 million
"having another opinion with saad interview yesterday that tried to make it political, it means he failed to make it political as it still showed to be a commemoration.
in other term, he got
1- few people coming there for political reasons, belonging to the future movement, LF etc...
2-many coming for the commemoration
3- and many not comming as the convergency of interest btw them and the future is over.
the 2 and 3 is showing the clear erosion of the future movement. and the 2 is the majority of the people that were there i guess (this is a personal interpretation)
i was tempted to go but i didnt on my side, i m belonging to the third category as far i m not feeling myself to be next to the people that were pro syrians for so long and just turning to be against syrians since the equilibrium of the forces changed in 2003"
Whether that's one million or 500 thousand protesters, it's a BIG demonstration by anybody's standards.
According to the end of day official estimates released by the police in Lebanon, the number of protesters was around 800,000 and organizers believe it is 1,000,000. Therefore it is somewhere in between.
I also want to comment that it is a shame that you and some others don't look at this as a positive for Lebanon and just another step forward towards our sovereignty.
It is a shame that there are those out there that just follow leaders blindly and do not question their strategies as self serving and harmful to our nation.
It is a shame that some of those who have always carried the mantle of independence from Syria are the first to be corrupted by the prospect of power.
I do not have any affiliation with the FM or any other political party, I just have loyalties to a struggling nation seeking a chance. Stop following blindly and realize that siding with the enemy is catipulation, and the presidency is not worth your dignity.
depends on the aim of theses of why the majority of people came for.
as souvenir for what happened?
and who are they?
how much people joumblatt can mobilise since it s a feodal leader.
how much the future can mobilise since he replaced the traditional leaders.
500 000 persons mainly sunnits and druze, if we had a real christian presence, we would have been having a million as far as the LF people are just a noisy minority
i m still seing a marginalisation of the christians into that therefore i m pessimistic.:
i just know one person that is christian that went there from all the christian's people i know in kesrouan, metn and beirut and since her dad was working for hariri, she was feeling the obligation to be there.
(ps i m not frequenting LF people, i guess i dont like those people making nazi salutation, i learned last year to put their hands on their heart instead of it as far it used to be a very bad advertisement for the cause of the cedar's liberation if such pictures were shown to the foreign medias)
this is how we can use numbers, to try to guess why that commemoration and not manifestation was a failure instead of being the success that they are claiming it to be.
if we manifestated last year it was for the freedom of speech , as u re still signing to be anomynous, are u afraid of something?
i m not believing in this million, as far i prefer to rely on foreign occidentals medias instead of the brainwashing pro governemental medias LBC, nahar, future, the truth is never black, it s never white, the truth is always gray.
about the internal security forces, maybe they got now the orders to change the numbers .
we have 2 speeches, one for abroad and one internal speech, like that fatfat interview in liberation that was then denied by himself.
we re living in a media dictature right now
to tell u the truth i m not a aounist but i m feeling u re not understanding the current game which is not against an agonising syrian regime but against the possibility of an islamic republic in syria that would aim to control back lebanon. u should therefore try to project yourself not in the past but in the future
just continue that way and we ll do all together our suitcases to emigrate far from this country called lebanon
i hate when i m hearing people: u re not with us therefore you re against us, they dont understand that free opinion is a right, free exposure of that opinion is not only a right but a must.
u re maybe struggling
I am not hiding anything, i just never post and didn't feel like registering...but i made an exception this time.
To answer a few of your points:
1. the numbers I have seen are not from Lebanese media, I don't live in Lebanon so I don't watch LBC or Future. What I mentioned was broadcast on the news here in the US, albeit all media is biased but we have to make a decision based on their reporting. I will note however that your numbers came from earlier in the day and estimates do change when authorities have the time to review photos, etc.
2. Why is it that people resort to the fear of the unknown to maintain the status quo? If anything we should have freedom from fear and spur change in a dictatorial regime. If a new democratic regime in Syria is a democratic one , yet Islamic then so be it.
A question to you...why would an Islamic Syria invade us again? The current regime has more to gain in Lebanon than any future one, it took 20 plus years to infiltrate our societies and institutions like this.
3. I never said you are either with us or against us. I just stated my opinion and responded to you out of respect of your opinion. I never insulted you, I just took the opportunity to share my thoughts, the same way you did.
Discussion is healthy don't you think? I wrote my earlier post because i saw that you were trying to dampen this blogger's enthusiasm for today's events by trying to disclaim the number of participants, and I found new and relevant information that supports the organizers' numbers.
Rabih (no screen name, handle or anonymous needed to hind behind)
Aounists and Hezbollah's militiamen will not succeed into transforming this happy day into a defeat. Look at the picture: it's february and the weather is sunny. Not a coincidence.
Hey you can rely on Manar, aka the orange truth. They said that the event was attended by 2 babies and one old lady.
when it comes to analyse what s going in the region we see the push of the muslim brotherhoods in egypt, hamas and what is going on in iraq
we saw zarkawi speech claiming he wants to enlarge the fight to syria and lebanon
i m believing we re facing a global strategy in this region which aims to lead to islamic republics
by pushing to overthrow the current weak regime, and not timing it to a transition processus, we would get an islamic regime in syria.
it ll be an obligation for any kind of regime in syria to get its influence back on lebanon since all the coup d etat in syria were prepared or came historically from lebanon.
hafez el assad regime now was stable because he was controling lebanon.
of course we need to tempter that enthousiam as we need plans to get to objectives and results
of course we need to remove lahoud from this presidency but we cannot through a parlement elected with an electoral law dating from the syrian occupation and therefore not representative of the lebanese population
of course the syrian regime must go but let it it in a pacific way in order to avoid the establishment of an arabic islamic republic in syria
of course we ll need to disarm the hezbollah but lebanon doesnt have the army to disarm it therefore we need a processus to calm the shiit componment, and this comes from removing the threats to shiits, among them the israelien threat therefore through a negociation process giving back the sheb'a farm and by disarming the palestinians before getting hezbollah s weapons.
i m not agree with the future mouvement on theses issues as i m feeling also they are lying on many issues.
i used to work in 2001 for a weekly report, i was dealing with confidencial reports inside a well known instutition, i was writing articles and many of them were refused?
why bcz everytimes they were telling me, u cannot say that, yes its true but our shareholders wouldt accept.
since that time i m doubting about everything , and this include our official pro governemental media
i m having another lecture of the events, do we need diversity of points of views to get a good result or do we need just to focus on one point of view and make huge mistakes
for example it was possible to remove lahoud after the election of the parlement but it wasnt done
i was believing that a governement future- aoun- joumblatt was the best solution but the future and joumblatt decided to leave the hezbollah getting inside the game
but what made me changing my point of view and as we say in french, seuls les imbeciles ne changent pas d avis, were the al qaida operation against north of israel from lebanon and zarkawi statement
showing me long time before that 5 of february that threat.
coming from that point, i putted back everything in question, i globalised my thoughs not only for lebanon but for the whole region and this is the result i have reached.
i dont care about an agonising syrian regime, i care about the future of lebanon. i wouldnt like that all the moderated lebanse would live this country because of fanatism as this fanatism is a trend in the region.
we should always put our heart aside when it comes to politic otherwise the 5th of sunday was about to become a catastrophy and we have to think with our brain instead of our heart.
try to think not with your heart but with your brain
see what i wrote up, i m doubting of all the kind of the local information.
hope i was clear enough guys
TF1 just reported one million! Is that good enough for you.
God you Aounists will go to any length to get some credit!
Well I hope Aoun got the message!! One million people disagree with him
One million Lebanese disagree with his selling of his soul and the principles of the FPM, for the sake of being president!
Can we just make him President of his villa in Rabieh? would that satisfy him?
just open a blog: future-propaganda-blogspot.com , u ll economise your keyboard ;)
replied on the other post
see u there
TF1 is French, France is Chirac, Chirac is Hariri
Until the General goes down there and count the Christians there himself (assuming he can count), I'll maintain that there's (at most) 666 Christians at this commemoration.
when u re putting aside one parameter, u re making huge mistake in understanding the mechanism
this is what u re doing that s all
the future humus? yah i m feeling the threat of that islamism the region ll know and i m afraid that most of you ll just do their suitcases in the next 10 years that ll come
I hope we can all agree that the FM has made a respectable demonstration regardless of the count.
The real questions are:
Can they move beyond their demand for the Truth?
How long can the Lebanese support their program economically?
Despite my distaste for Aoun, he has cleverly put himself in the position of being the only person that can bridge the divide in current Lebanese politics.
Can anyone explain why the FM leaves Lahoud in power when we can have Aoun as President and move on with our affairs. This gridlock only serves their leaders .
I agree with Issam on that. Better to have this idiot Aoun than Lahoud.
Dude, did it ever occur to you that both of these “reliable sources” you’re quoting from were 100%-owned Saudi media with a blatant conflict of interest?
Would you have trusted the Pravda to publish accurate figures on say the number of demonstrators in Gdansk back in the Halcyon days of comrade Leonid Brezhnev?
As for you neurotic fixation on the secular Syrian regime, when everyone and their Paki janitor knows the anti-Danish campaign is orchestrated by Saudi Arabia’s fanatical Wahhabi preachers, well this only serves to show once more the abysmal lows to which the gullible March 14 dupes have sunk…
We're not interested in your petty comments Vic.
Being a Shia Muslim is one thing, and supporting Iran is another. You are free to do both, but you cannot base your support for Iran on its alleged role as "leader of Shia islam". Iran's brand of Shia Islam is based on Khomeini's Vilayat al Faqih. My advice to you is to read up on the history of twelver shiism. Not all Shia agree or follow Khomeini, inlcuding some Iranians, and many Iraqis and Lebanese.
I recommend Moujan Momen's "An Introduction to Shi'i Islam".